|
Re: Beginners' Questions regarding Singletons
Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:24:30 -0600
alt.astrology.moderated
previous
Carter...
|
Diana wrote,..
"Why should anybody do this? What would be so good about that
Conjunction especially on the ascendant?"
well most moderns go for the juicy bits yes,.?
similar to that which has you mentioning PlutoCharon all the time in the
first,.. You are noticing the Jup Sat conjunction here,.. but the mod
excitement of asteroids like PlutoCharon, an extremely "Minor" point in
Astrology,.. And trying to explain everything by his measure,..
CFA...
|
Minor? For me, Mars doesn't even begin to cover the scope of Pluto.
|
I wouldnt try explain everything by Plutocharon in the first guys,..
thats kind of a trap really,...
CFA...
|
I wasn't. It was just a comment about Pluto in 1.
|
First of all, PlutoCharon is smaller than our Moon, and actually two
bodies Pluto and Charon around one center of gravity,..
the next is, do you realise that Diana is ancient as a mechanism for
truth,.. a mechanism for divine oracle abilities,..
One should give this One in 20yr Conjunction the respect it deserves,..
this is my antagonism,.. and please i do apologise for it,..
i just frustrate rather quickly for the modern approach to such things,.
People will overlook the two greatest planets in our solar system, the
parents, of our solar bodies,... Planets with "Moons" Larger than
Mercury and PlutoCharon for that matter,..
CFA...
|
Two greatest? Of the planets visible, unaided, yes.
|
These two then in all their glory, only together every 20yrs,.. as if
this is not good enough, we have dodgy plutocharon nearby,.. "which must
be responsible for everything",..
well that's "Watered Down" astrology if you ask me,..
i am rather firmly against it,... as coming from those born in the 80's
it must be understood, that you guys need to endear a bit more reverence
for the tradition as presented to us by our forefathers,..
this art/science is not here for you guys to rewrite,..
me neither,.. and this is the responsibility we have to the future
humanity,..
CFA...
|
The implication here is you're moving back to the 'traditional' seven?
I thought I was a minimalist, holding it to ten :-)
|
|
next
|