Royal Genes


Safe For Kids





Still more opinions needed



Fri, 23 Dec 2005 12:25:42 -0500 alt.genealogy
previous


Althiom...
Below is a real life extract from an obit (name changed to protect
etc.)
Gertrude G. Laws, 85


Althiom...
Survivors include her husband, Eli Laws Jr., Ocala; mother, Dora
Brookside, Americus, Ga.; daughters, Mona L. Gabriel, Athens, Ga., and
Mitzi L. Buchan, LaGrange, Ga.; son, Dana E. Laws, Orlando; brother,
Dan L. Brookside Jr., Albany; and six grandchildren.

My question is, from the above snippet what information can be
'extracted' pertaining to the individual's family??

From the above I get this:
Family 1 -
Gertrude G. [Brookside] Laws -> derived from mothers name and brother
name
Mona L.[Laws] Gabriel -> derives from mothers/fathers name
Mitzi L. [Laws] Buchan -> derives from mothers/fathers name

Family 2 -
Dora Brookside - mother
Gerturde G. [Brookside] Laws - daughter
Dan L. Brookside - brother

Please note that in other obits I have seen references to
Step-brothers/sisters, foster sons/daughters/brothers/sisters,
grandparents (both maternal and paternal) and was just wondering
how far I should do the extraction as it is all conjecture.

As geneaologists would having these conjectures be of help or would
they be more of a hinderance when doing your research?

Hugh Watkins...
just enter it all into (eg) FTM 2006 and then modify the data as other
sources confirm or deny your assumptions

for example the mother may been in her third or fourth marriage by now

as a stand alone source it has little value
being what some junior reporterr scribbled down

hear-say

Hugh W
next