Royal Genes


Safe For Kids





More Stats: 1950-2005



14 Apr 2006 10:04:17 -0700 rec.arts.tv
previous


WQ...
Taking a bit of a different slant from the last
Stats posting, this one looks at which have
been the 11 most successful fall seasons
for new series renewals and which have
been the 11 least successful. This rundown
covers 1950-2005 and, for consistency's
sake, only the Big 3, ABC, CBS and NBC.
This time around, there's no distinction
made between Successes and Failed
Successes as last time; if a series got
renewed, it got renewed, regardless if it
lasted another 20 years or 20 minutes after
its first season.

The year is followed by the number of new
series renewed out of the total number of new
fall series followed by the percentage of
renewals.

Top 11 Successful Fall Seasons

1968: 15/24 = 62.5%
1969: 15/25 = 60.0%
1954: 18/30 = 60.0%
1957: 25/45 = 55.5%
2002: 10/18 = 55.5%
1955: 17/32 = 53.1%
1996: 13/26 = 50.0%
1986: 11/23 = 47.8%
1967: 12/26 = 46.1%
2004: 8/18 = 44.4%
1965: 15/34 = 44.1%

Bottom 11 Unsuccessful Fall Seasons

1979: 5/19 = 26.3%
1981: 5/20 = 25.0%
1976: 6/23 = 26.0%
1978: 5/21 = 23.8%
1994: 5/21 = 23.8%
1983: 5/22 = 22.7%
1990: 5/23 = 21.7%
1973: 4/23 = 17.3%
1951: 5/30 = 16.6%
1975: 4/26 = 15.3%
1997: 4/26 = 15.3%

Observations:

4 of the 11 most successful seasons fall
between 1965 and 1969, being the only
5-year period of any permutation of 5
consecutive years for that to happen.
2 of those 4 rate the highest on the list.
Seems that the nets were in tune with
not only my tastes, with 1965-69 being
my favorite era, but most other people's
tastes as well at the time.

Obveeus...
Interesting interpretation. I'd say that those years are the ones where the
nets were least in tune with the public...thus, they had the most dumping of
older shows going on and the most *need* to develop new stuff.

David...
Most importantly, they didn't have the sama data then. It took weeks
for them to get nielsen ratings that are now available overnight and
the information they eventually got was basic. So if shows stayed on
the air longer it's because network heads weren't as informed about
what worked and what didn't.


Tony Calguire...
My goodness, you're full of yourself, aren't you! I suspose it's just a
coincedence that 65-69 was probably the most tumultuous period in modern
American history, with politics and popular culture changing day by day,
and an affluent American middle class turning to three TV networks to
keep up with all the change.


Conversely, 4 of the worst seasons fall
between 1975 and 1979, again being the
only 5-year period of any permutation of
5 consecutive years for that to happen.
Interestingly, I also found this to be a
pretty rotten time for the tube. The high

Tony Calguire...
That's an interesting interpretation. When I saw "1975-1979", the first
thing that popped into my head was a long list of much-beloved series
which began before that period and, in some cases, continued after it...
Mary Tyler Moore, Bob Newhart, Carol Burnett, Hawaii Five-O, M*A*S*H,
All In The Family, Little House on the Prarie, The Waltons... pretty
lousy track record, eh?

failure rate in this period can probably be
largely attributed to the huge favorable
ratings shift to ABC for the first time ever,
thanks to Fred Silverman's takeover of its
schedule in 1975, which caused more
programming panic than necessary at
CBS and NBC and the beginning of
trigger-finger cancellations.

The rest of the seasons not noted here
fall in what can be considered as the
average range, between a 27% and 42%
success rating. Among those, 1985-88
sees a steady successful period that
registered over 40% for each of those
years [the only other consistent 5-year
stretch], while a few others at the lower
end of the scale include 1970, 1977,
1989 and 2000 with 24%-27%.

When it comes to Average Scores for
5-year periods, 1965-69 comes out the
winner with a 48.2% success rating,
followed by 1955-59 with 43.5% On the
worst side of things, 1975-79 is the loser
with only a 23.3% success rating, followed
by 1990-94 with 29.0%. Everything else
between 30-43% can be considered as the
middle ground. The current 5-year stretch,
2000-05, scores a 40.2%, at the high end
of the middle ground.

What does this prove? Well, certainly when
it comes to the highest and lowest ends of
things, 1965-69 and 1975-79, the results concur
with my own view of those periods in terms of
personal tastes in programming. Even the
results for the latter half of the '80s show
that networks had a better knack for more
successful programming choices than in the
first half of the '80s, being pretty much how I
myself viewed '80s TV at the time. So there
seems to be a certain accuracy with most
individual seasons and 5-year stretches. To
determine the extent of the accuracy would
mean having to go deeper into the numbers
than I'm willing to go right now. But on the
surface of it, I can relate to these figures in a
general sense.

Tony Calguire...
So, let me get this straight... you enjoy things that are popular, and
you dislike things that are unpopular? It's like you're from Mars or
something!

But I will give you credit for one thing... you've learned to use
PARAGRAPHS!
next