1 vs. 100 ???

Am I missing something or is asking the mob, who gets to split the money
amassed to that point if the player is wrong, a really bad idea? Kind
of like taking a rattle snake along foe protection. Even if there was
some rule to the effect that the had to be honest, how would you know
they were being so? Unless the idea would be to treat it like a
Hollywood Squares bluff situation. Or am I missing some obvious point?
Is it as simple as them already having locked an answer in already?

KenStahl...

When did this occur in the most recent episode of the Jerry
Springer show. I have to assume that it was either from that
show or from the David Letterman show since you obviously
didn't think it was important enough to list the name of the
show on the subject line. A bit rude I think.

David Levy...

Milhouse Van Houten...

It was quite interesting how Bob Saget did not remind her that she had them
left, even though he had on some earlier questions and she even said aloud
on the previous question (from the last show) that she's continuing because
she has those left. You'd think it would be part of the host's duties to
remind a contestant of what they're leaving on the table when they're about
to quit.

Also, is that it for Ken Jennings for good? He missed that 50-50 blind

David Levy...

The program is heavily edited (with dialogue added/removed), so it's
possible that he did remind her.

David Levy...

I would assume so.

guess roulette question, like scores of others. If I were the producers, I'd
have him be the permanent backstop on the show.

David Levy...

It wouldn't be fair to allow him to stay on after answering a question
incorrectly, and I doubt that Ken is interested in becoming a regular
participant.

"1 vs. 100" *is* the show's title.