|
POLL: Who here does Not have Cable/Satellite TV?
3 Feb 2006 09:26:49 -0800
rec.arts.tv
previous
videonovels...
|
(1) No I don't have cable or satellite / Not available where I live.
(2) No I don't have cable or satellite / I choose not to buy the
service
(3) No (other reason)
A Man, Just Like Other Men...
|
(2) - I watch too much TV already. What am I going to do with 100 more
channels?
|
Tristan Miller...
|
Well, I suppose I count as a #2, though the choice is rather easy since I
don't have a television to begin with. ;)
|
.
.
.
Thanks. My reason is option (2). I can't afford to waste $550 a year
on cable tv, so I watch everything off of DVDs (cheaper) or antenna
(free).
Locutus...
|
$550 a year?? My sat is $110 a month...
videonovels...
|
I can not afford $1320/year for satellite either. (What are you?
Rich?)
|
|
Mac Breck...
|
(2). Reason: Currently, I don't have enough free time to keep up with
all of the stuff that I can receive acceptably over an antenna. Having
cable or satellite, which would give me many more channels, would be a
100% waste of money.
If I like a show enough, and it bears repeated viewings (e.g. Babylon
5), I get it on DVD.
|
|
next
|