Complete Histories of Paul's MOST NONDESCRIPT Lp's -- SPEED OF SOUND and McCARTNEY II

I have included links to all known information regarding Paul's two most
utterly nondescript LP's -- Recording details, production background,

poisoned rose...

OK, this has become ridiculous now.

poisoned rose...

Suggested further categories to explore:

Paul's MOST SECOND-RATE Lp's
Paul's MOST IMPERFECT Lp's
Paul's MOST LESS-THAN-GREAT Lp's
Paul's MOST UNEVEN Lp's
Paul's MOST MILDLY PRAISED Lp's
Paul's MOST HALF-GOOD Lp's
Paul's MOST JUST-OK Lp's
Paul's MOST MIDDLING Lp's

songwriting, cover design, chart positions, unreleased tracks (if any), even
a description of each format the album was originally released in (cassette,
8-track, etc.)

If you disagree with my selection of these two LP's as his most nondescript,
I can only say 'too bad'. Post your own preferences if you don't agree.

WINGS AT THE SPEED OF SOUND:

McCARTNEY II:

Runnnerr...

Would you please provide YOUR definition of "nondescript"

Pompeo...

Same as at dictionary.com. Are you illiterate?

Runnnerr...

Thanks for confirming my suspicions that you don't know what the word
means and that the best you can do is "same as at dictionary.com". I
asked for your definition of the word. You're not able to provide that
and in fact, you could only refer me to dictionary.com.

Apparently, I'm not the one who's illiterate.

Pompeo...

Uh-oh. Somebody who doesn't know how to look up a web address.

What is it about "same as at dictionary.com" that you don't understand?

Runnnerr...

Did any of your parents' children survive?

These two articles are advance chapters of a book currently being written
about Paul McCartney's recorded legacy.