|
Re: White Album: MFSL, Ebbets or DMM-version?
13 Apr 2006 17:20:44 -0700
rec.music.beatles
previous
jpgr1972...
|
Depends on stereo or mono...I like the MIrror Spock DMM version of the
stereo, but Ebbett's mono version is the best.
Fire Man...
|
Sorry, but you're mistaken. The BEAT CD version from 1993 is the best mono
version available.
DanKaye...
|
I have all 3 and there isn't THAT much difference; that is to say,
they all have their good points and bad points. Of the 3 I like the
Dr. Ebbetts version best in Mono. In stereo, probably Millenium
Remasters.
|
Rev. Love...
|
Is this your opinion, the opinion of the majority, or are you just
regurgitating someone else's information you heard or read. Was this in
some popularity poll? Are there any notable scholars you can name, who
have conferred for great lengths of time only to conclude the BEAT CD
is the best mono? If you are gonna call someone out, at least provide
factual sources to back up such a thin argument. You came off quite
redicules.
I personally believe the original UK Apple label vinyl mono to be the
best. Just the way both Martin and Beatles produced it at the time. All
these alternate masters are for those of us who are always searching
for a new way to listen to the same songs. There is more to be said for
the work The Beatles put into the recording and mixing with all the
limitations of the time.
|
|
|
next
|