Royal Genes


Safe For Kids





Question



Mon, 9 Oct 2006 17:04:17 -0700 rec.music.beatles
previous


Lookingglass...
Anyone familiar with this item...?

DanKaye...
Why is your shorter link longer than his?

Lookingglass...
...you makin' fun of my short link? Step outside!!!

;^)

dancin' dave (...she's not a girl who misses much...)


Dale Houstman...
Good genetics...

donz5...
Hey! I'm standing right here...

Dale Houstman...
Then sit down. We can see your vienna sausages...


DC...
A knockoff of a bootleg?

A bootleg isn't good enough if it's not listed in one of those books?

donz5...
There were a number of bootleg knockoffs back then.

DC...
I was around, and foolishly bought some bad bootlegs, but by definition,
a bootleg is a bootleg (is a bootleg).

DanKaye...
Yeah, it just looks like a generic bootleg from right before Let It Be
hit the streets. I bought one back then in a plain grey cover, I don't
recall what the title was, but the quality was horrible. That's not to
say this one is, I just don't know. But I'd be skeptical.


donz5...
Then there are bootlegs of bootlegs of which this appears to be one.


dancin' dave (...you won't see me...)

GTverå...
This is obviously a bootleg containing tracks from the unreleased Get Back
album, possibly from a promo of that album. Some of the titles are spelled
terribly wrong. It could mean that the record pre-dates Let It Be lp, or
that the bootleggers didn't care to check out the correct titles.
I bet the sound is as bad as the spelling.

DC...
I agree. I had some vinyl bootlegs around that time that sounded
horrible, and looked similar.
next