|
Am I allowed.....?
Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:46:03 GMT
soc.genealogy.britain
previous
\"kls\"...
|
I have just purchased a 72 hour subscription to the Family Origins Website
and haven't found anything relevant to my research :((
Am I allowed to offer lookups for people on here as it seems such a waste to
let it lapse almost unused?
If so, and if I'm not breaching any etiquette/laws, I am willing to do
lookups until my subscription runs out Monday afternoon.
katyjane...
|
I would very much appreciate any information on Louisa Taylor, born
around 1827 in Holbrook, Derbyshire. Possibly with siblings Tamar or
Tamera (b1830) and Elisha (b1832) - should be in the Belper area.
Thanks very much
|
People from this group have helped me in the past and I'd like to be able to
give something back.
Michael Corby...
|
I've thanked Karen privately for her offer and then for the look-up she did
for me. I'd like to put on the list my thoughts that she was so generous as
to spend the remaining hours of her subscription hastily doing look-ups on
people that she had no interest in, for group members whom she did not know.
She could easily have sat back with a cup of tea and a good book instead.
Bravo!
Mike
|
Hugh Watkins...
|
of course
the more you tell people about the site
the more will maybe try it for themselves
My own annual sub has lapsed so I am giving it a rest
There are a couple of things that need fixing in my opinion
1)
you must have a surname for example
difficult with unknown maiden names
2)
you cannot easily read a whole piece by number
if you want to browse
3)
too many time outs
otherwise an excellent site
Hugh W
|
Karen :))
Jill....
|
If folks say its okay and you come across any Bowis references I would be
incredibly grateful.
|
\"kls\"...
|
John,
Could you e-mail me a valid e-mail addy so I'm not sending attachments to
the group again.
Karen :))
|
Kevin Ettery...
|
Cant see any problem with doing that.
Any chance of getting any of the info on any of the ETTERY or ETTRY families
listed
please.
Kevin Ettery
|
Nat Stott...
|
Oh dear. Thanks for looking.
When I do the free search, on exact match, it lists three hits under
18451/1871 census, she must be in 1871 census, which I already have.
|
|
next
|