|
The Gentry & the Landed Gentry
30 Nov 2005 06:34:08 -0800
soc.genealogy.britain
previous
StephenP...
|
Does anyone know the criteria for being listed in (the old) Burke's
Landed Gentry?
1) Was there a minimum acreage required?
Eve McLaughlin...
|
said to be 1000 acres, not a measly 999.
|
myths...
|
I'm not sure about Burke, but I dimly (I was very young) recollect
being told in the 1950s that in the 1940s one of the Landed Gentry
compliers reduced the necessary acreage.
Eve McLaughlin...
|
yes - the 1000 acre estate was by then pretty rare, but the families
continued (if only in a semi-detached in Erdington).
myths...
|
Certainly that was the attitude for Burke's "Irish Families" in the
1970s - enabling them to include families that used to be, but were no
longer (any of ??) Irish Landed Gentry.
The change of acreage that I recall was to something still noticeably
larger than a smallholding, but the reduction enabled some families to
become, for the first time, "Landed Gentry" - making at least one man
very happy .
|
|
|
2) Did the land have to be owned rather than leased?
Eve McLaughlin...
3) Did there have to be a "seat"?
Eve McLaughlin...
|
well, somewhere no doubt, but not always where the main landholding
was.
|
Any ideas?
andrew...
|
Stephen -
You may care to look at
explain the Victorian concept of a gentleman.
Yours Aye Andrew Sellon
If you desire the common people to treat you as a gentleman, you must
conduct yourself as a gentleman should do to them. Rev. Sydney Smith
1771-1854, Canon of St. Paul's.
|
Yours aye
|
next
|