Transcription errors on Anc'

If every error is the subject of a message, we'll be reading them when
the Atlantic freezes over!!!

PLEASE can't we leave anc's errors alone?

mvernonconnolly...

A lot of the mistakes are quite 'logical', just a letter or three
misread, but the really gross errors are admirable in their way. Today

Dave Mayall...

And often mistakes are not in the transcription!

A challenge for those who use Ancestry...

1851 - HO107/2065 fol 263 pg 45

William BULL, and family

Also found in 1871 at RG10/3170 fol 75 pg 4

myths...

RG9/2196 f.14 p.22

Dave Mayall...

Correct! :-)

An entry which has (I think you'll agree) been accurately transcribed from a
clear original, yet is rather difficult to find.

The challenge is to find this family in 1861 (and yes I have done so, and
will post the details on Monday if nobody else finds them)

I came across the surname 'Whitehorn' transcribed as 'Jaquest'! That
takes style. Plus, it makes one all the more pleased to track it down.