|
Amended marriage registration?
22 Feb 2006 15:54:26 -0800
soc.genealogy.britain
previous
A. Gwilliam...
|
The marriages index for the June quarter of 1913 shows what is
presumably an amended registration for a Daisy Slingsby. I wasn't
aware that such an amendment was possible.
John E Wynn...
|
I don't think it's an amended entry - just an entry that was somehow
missed when the indexes were compiled. If it was meant to be a
birth entry they have also missed the mothers maiden name (which was
introduced prior to 1913)
Although rare I have several marriage certificates that required
amendment and re-registration, the most interesting being one where
the bride originally claimed to be 32 years old but was later found to
be 46 years old.
John Wynn
|
The details of the handwritten entry are:
Slingsby
Daisy
Chesterfield
7B
1350A
My gut feeling is that this is really an amended birth registration
that's been entered into the marriages index in error; circumstantial
evidence is that there's no spouse's surname given.
Has anyone ever come across something like this before?
Charani...
|
It could be that there was an error in the original marriage entry
which needed corrected, hence the amended entry. I've seen additional
entries made to the index, but I can't recollect an amendment in any
of the many marraige volumes I've searched over the years.
CWatters...
|
I've had a look at the image at FreeBMD and it does look like an additional
entry rather than a correction. It's hand written at the end of the page and
they put an X showing where it should have been inserted. There happens to
be an Edward J Slingsby marriage at that point but I don't think it's
intended to be a correction to Edwards entry as the district, volume and
page for Edward is different.
Not sure what to make of the missing spouse.
Charani...
|
Or it could be as you suspect. Worth a query to the GRO perhaps, esp
if Daisy is one of yours?
|
Geoff...
|
Dozens of times when I searched hundreds of microfiches in the local
public library.
|
Dave Mayall...
|
I wouldn't be so quick to assume that this is an amended entry.
"a" page numbers in marriages are far more usually encountered when a vicar
was late sending his returns to the GRO and they were inserted into the
bundle after the pages had been numbered.
|
|
next
|