|
Seal recaping the Peche-Notbeme-Hinckley-Caldebeck-Underhill descent
2 Mar 2006 14:41:39 -0800
soc.genealogy.medieval
previous
John Brandon...
|
I thought this seal was very interesting =
W. de G. Birch, _Catalogue of Seals in the Department of Manuscripts in
the British Museum_, 3:559:
Sir Martin Stuteville, of Dalham, co. Suff.
John Brandon...
|
There is a pedigree chart in Cussans' _Hertfordshire_ showing a
Knighton of Bayford married to a Le Hunt and showing Le Hunt and Soames
descendants. This seemed somewhat interesting, as the New England line
married into a Hunt family, but maybe it's all covered in _The
Genealogist_, 10 (1989):3-30.
|
13,759. [A.D. 1628]. Red: very indistinct, injured by pressure.
About 1 x 7/8 in. when perfect. [Add. ch. 9281.]
Oval: a shield of arms: quarterly of [nine] pieces: 1.
STUTEVILLE; 2. BORLEY; 3. WALKFAIR; 4. UNDERHILL; 5. CALDEBECK;
[6. HINDLEY [sic]; 7. NOTBEENE or NOTBONE; 8. PEACH; 9. BIRDE.]
Crest on a helmet, ornamental mantling and wreath, six mantles, ermine
and ermines.
Carved border.
Tim Powys-Lybbe...
|
Regrettably not. The order in an achievement of arms is solely the
order of the heiresses (those with no brothers with issue, they don't
have to have money or property). Birde could be several generations
before Peach or even on the next branch after Peach, so Birde may not
even be a relation of Peach.
In general you have to do the genealogy first before getting onto the
heraldry, the exception to this being when husband and wife are shown
with their arms impaled.
|
|
next
|