Royal Genes


Safe For Kids





Re: What this list is



Tue, 16 May 2006 22:02:51 +0000 (UTC) soc.genealogy.medieval
previous


WJhonson...
In a message dated 5/16/06 2:36:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time,

<< But I would be interested in discussions on
18th-19th century Polish and Ukrainian ancestry, or Irish (or anywhere
else, come to that!) >>

But there are at least 5 thousand lists at rootsweb.
Why try to change this one, instead of just subscribing to one that is more

Tim Powys-Lybbe...
Yet:


Tim Powys-Lybbe...
If that is not a change I don't know what is!

relevant?
Will

Renia...
Good point. But my point is that if Americans can discuss their 17th
century British ancestry here, then why can't the British discuss their
17th century ancestry here? (or Polish, Irish, Dutch, Spanish, etc.)

Todd A. Farmerie...
I don't recall anyone saying they couldn't - certainly they have at
times. 1600 was intended to be a fuzzy number.
next