ancestry trees from "unknown"

Has anyone noticed lately that when looking at family trees on
Ancestry that a growing number of them do not have a contact name,
only "unknown" at the top of the page. This really makes it
difficult to identify sources, connect with the contributor or
verify that the info is correct. I for one would like to complain
about it, but not sure where to send the complaint.

Lois Heath

Lois Brinks-Heath

Hugh Watkins...

please give an url

never seen that

Hugh W

Eagle...

I've noticed. Of 21 tress I viewed yesterday only 3 had contacts.
But, based on the misinformation contained it's probably better to
remain unknown. Who has time to send all those people proof of how
wrong they are?

It's best to use any "harvested" info as a clue, nothing more. You
might try repeating, "It ain't nuthin' 'til I say it is." several
times.

Hugh

Eagle@adelphia.net (J. Hugh Sullivan)